<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jonathan Strange &amp; Mr. Norrell; or, The Return of English Magic (Subtitle Mine)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theottery.com/2007/04/jonathan-strange-or-the-return-of-english-magic-subtitle-mine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theottery.com/2007/04/jonathan-strange-or-the-return-of-english-magic-subtitle-mine/</link>
	<description>"If an otter can't have fun doing something, it just simply won't do it."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:55:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mink</title>
		<link>http://www.theottery.com/2007/04/jonathan-strange-or-the-return-of-english-magic-subtitle-mine/comment-page-1/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>mink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theottery.com/2007/04/jonathan-strange-or-the-return-of-english-magic-subtitle-mine/#comment-498</guid>
		<description>Oh good - I thought I was the only one disappointed. I agree with your assessment that it is ingenious in plot, charming in style, striking in setting, and deft in characterization, yet unable to evoke the most delightful of myth-encounter experiences, Sehnsucht, as you put it. My hunch was that this absence of the beauty/pain/longing phenomenon is due to a lack of transcendence. Despite the wealth of detail and careful coincidence of &quot;real&quot; history and imagined history, Clarke&#039;s world operates on an interesting variety of physical, psychological, and philosophical levels, but neglects to incorporate a spiritual level. The characters seem limited by the absence of a world containing their world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh good &#8211; I thought I was the only one disappointed. I agree with your assessment that it is ingenious in plot, charming in style, striking in setting, and deft in characterization, yet unable to evoke the most delightful of myth-encounter experiences, Sehnsucht, as you put it. My hunch was that this absence of the beauty/pain/longing phenomenon is due to a lack of transcendence. Despite the wealth of detail and careful coincidence of &#8220;real&#8221; history and imagined history, Clarke&#8217;s world operates on an interesting variety of physical, psychological, and philosophical levels, but neglects to incorporate a spiritual level. The characters seem limited by the absence of a world containing their world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
