Reflections of a “Veronica Mars” Newbie

November 29th, 2006

In case you didn’t know, last night’s episode of “Veronica Mars” concluded the first half of the show’s season 3. We’ll have to wait to January to find out the answers to mysteries new and old.

As someone whose cable company didn’t carry UPN and therefore couldn’t watch “Veronica Mars” until the creation of the CW this fall, I understand that I’m missing out on what most loyal Martians seem to think are the best episodes (namely, those in season 1 and season 2). I did recently watch the first two episodes of season 1, and I think I can see why fans like it better (more on that later).

As new viewers at the start of season 3, Porpoise and I had a tough time learning who all the characters were. I don’t know if it’s because we’re getting old and cranky, but all the college kids (the white ones, anyway) kind of look alike. That, and they kind of look like the youngsters from High School Musical. Thanks to reading summaries on Wikipedia and Television without Pity, I think we’ve finally got who’s who sorted out, though we still don’t know all their histories (we’re trying to keep ourselves unspoiled for when we watch the rest of seasons 1 and 2).

The best reason to watch the show is, of course, Veronica. I like small people who can clearly take care of themselves (that she’s not doing as good a job of that this season is one frequent cause of fans’ complaint). But she’s still got her witty voiceovers (“When did the Greek Chorus of Feminist Shame arrive?”) and sarcastic exchanges with both friends and foes. The detective-daughter/detective-dad relationship is appealing.

As far as this season’s story arc, the big mystery involves the string of rapes on the “Hearst College” campus. Rape’s definitely an important subject, but I always get a bit cynical when TV shows make it their subject matter. I read an article once in Entertainment Weekly criticizing the depiction of abuse and rape of women in a lot of popular crime procedural shows. The argument was that, the way these stories were presented, it almost made viewers into sadistic voyeurs by emphasizing the women’s victimization. Veronica Mars certainly doesn’t do that, but, knowing that rape was also an important theme of the first season, I do wonder if rape gets so much emphasis on the show because our heroine is small and vulnerable-looking (thus she gets threatened a lot, we feel more fear for her character, and it’s more dramatic when she escapes or Tazes her attacker or whatever). But, then again, rape is an issue that Veronica cares about from her own experience, so there’s an internal motivation to foreground it. I’d be curious to hear what other people think of how the rape theme has been handled.

Anyway, on to last night’s episode. Skip the next few paragraphs, ye spoiler avoiders!

Okay, first comment: Why on earth didn’t Veronica try to find Piz or Mac or somebody to go with her before leaving the party to single-handedly prevent a girl’s rape? We know she’s independent, and this season seems to want to convince us that she’s too independent, but would she really be that stupid? From what I understand, the usual Veronica is independent and resourceful, not independent and stupid.

Second comment, and this is the one that really bugs me: the scene where we find out that Mercer is the rapist, the one where the writers decide to use monologue exposition to explain his motivations for rape, is really, really silly. It’s so silly that it almost makes you take the situation less seriously, which is not a good thing. We recognize that it’s ironic that he’s delivering his monologue to Veronica (yep, we could pretty much guess it was Veronica under the covers as soon as the scene began) when he thinks it’s to his intended victim. We get irony. We understand irony. We’d just like it mixed with a little subtlety and plausibility, please.

Third comment: there’s perhaps a little too much subtlety to the explanation of why Moe serves as Mercer’s accomplice. If I hadn’t read Television without Pity or talked to Dormouse (who also reads TWOP), I never would have caught on to the continuation of the guard-prisoner relationship from the sociology experiment episode. And I still don’t completely buy it as a motivation. Maybe it would make more sense if I’d seen the episodes closer together, though.

I complain about these writing problems, though, because I care. If the show’s writing weren’t ordinarily so good, it wouldn’t be worth it.

When comparing season 3 to season 1 (the two episodes I’ve seen), I do miss the social-class commentary that’s more possible in a high school setting. Also, the first season has the added strength of showing us a recently transformed Veronica. I do think it’s a brilliant move to have started the series after the events that changed her life: that way the contrast between current-Veronica and flashback-Veronica is all the more dramatic.

So, in conclusion, I’ll be watching the rest of season 3, but I’m actually more excited to catch up on what I’ve missed in seasons 1 and 2.

Entry Filed under: Uncategorized

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Jillian  |  November 30th, 2006 at 12:24 am

    Huh, well, I know folks like to complain about shows when they switch seasons… I daresay for the majority of them it has to do with the long summer hiatus and dreaming all the things they want to happen vs what actually does happen. Some may have valid points. I tend to be a bit more roll-with-the-punches and take a show for where it is. I’m liking season three–the show needed some fresh characters, setting and concepts.

    I’ve watched Veronica Mars from the beginning, so I sort of cringe when I hear about folks picking up in season three (although with the network issues its understandable). For example, the closing scene with Logan getting himself arrested so he can share a cell with Mercer is so perfectly in character for Logan both in his nature and how he was ‘nurtured.’ That was nice a subtle continuity suggesting that ‘old Logan’ hasn’t gone so far into ‘new Logan’ that ‘old Logan’ won’t resurface.

    Mercer’s monologue was cringe worthy, and I knew what the writers were trying to do… but I also think that’s an overall sadness I have about the show since season two… or more to the point: it’s always a character I like who ends up being the villain. *sigh* It’s hard to wrap my brain around that switch in affections. It’s like I have to be told or shown the character is one that I never should of liked and I feel a bit cheated in that respect. That’s what messes up my emotions most. What helped was that there were two villains… I, at least, was right about one of them.

    Which in a sense is a parallel to your ‘rape story’ comments only in a less obvious presentation.

    I was terribly worried that the rapes wouldn’t be real (how awful is that) or used to make some sort of point about feminists/frat-boys. While it was hastily revealed, I was glad that we know why Mercer did what he did. At least his character seemed the sort to chat to himself and have arrogant self-reflection.

    It’s possible that if I wanted to make large leaps in speculation, that this early season of season three has been trying to show the moral/immoral spectrum of relationships. We’ve had Logan/Veronica vulnerability issues, affairs, unfaithful girlfriends, and rape.

    I wonder if the second half of this season will have to do with ‘The Perfect Murder’ project… detective vs detective??? Not that there aren’t as many suspects in this case. Just as long as the Fitzpatricks leave Veronica alone (every time she ends up in that bar I cringe…yikes!).

    Yeah, I watch the show for Veronica. I adore her and am oddly endeared to her short-comings, her revenge-issues and high brow morals on certain other subjects. Veronica has the honor of being the only female on TV that I like. When she was crying in the shower… *heartache*

    :) Glad you’re watching!

  • 2. theotter  |  November 30th, 2006 at 5:02 am

    Has Mercer been a character prior to season 3?

    Oh, I forgot to mention that our local cable company seems to be having problems figuring out that CW actually is a channel, and that people watch it. There were a couple of weeks when “Gilmore Girls” either didn’t come through at all or was too fuzzy for viewing. (I don’t usually watch “Gilmore Girls,” but Porpoise does, and so do a bunch of other people who ALL called our house to see if our reception was any better.) And then there was the night that they completely bungled (as in, no picture and no sound) the second half of a “Veronica Mars” episode. As it turns out, that was a really important half-episode: it’s when Parker reacts to Mercer’s cologne and Mercer initially gets arrested for the rapes. So, though we’d read re-caps, we no doubt missed some important stuff about Mercer’s character. I feel like I hardly know him, so the “mustache-twirling” (to use Dormouse’s description) monologue felt especially heavy-handed.

    Hmm . . . I hadn’t thought about further development of “The Perfect Murder” theme. It could work, though. I liked it that when the criminology prof mentions that someone wrote their paper about how to kill a sheriff, we pretty much know it’s Veronica.

    We’ll try to catch up on seasons 1 and 2 before season 3 returns–somehow.

  • 3. Jillian  |  December 1st, 2006 at 2:56 pm

    Mercer was one of the new cast. I just happen to zero in on the tall, gangly cute, arrogant, smart-alec sort who said nice things to Veronica once. Alas, and they fooled me.

    I guess I’m still missing Casey from season one (Don’t Drink the Kool-Aid is one of my favorite episodes).

Leave a Comment

hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Calendar

November 2006
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Recent Posts