
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Verona Beach Teens Capable of Tragic Insight?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theottery.com/2006/03/are-verona-beach-teens-capable-of-tragic-insight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theottery.com/2006/03/are-verona-beach-teens-capable-of-tragic-insight/</link>
	<description>"If an otter can't have fun doing something, it just simply won't do it."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:55:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: theotter</title>
		<link>http://www.theottery.com/2006/03/are-verona-beach-teens-capable-of-tragic-insight/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>theotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theottery.com/2006/03/are-verona-beach-teens-capable-of-tragic-insight/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I would agree that Shakespeare&#039;s teens aren&#039;t really teens in the way we think of them today. But Luhrmann&#039;s R &amp; J kind of are, even though they&#039;re speaking Shakespeare&#039;s lines. Not completely, but at least partially. I guess that&#039;s what I find so jarring: updating them works, but I&#039;m not quite sure how it works with the additional emphasis on tragic insight. 

Definitely Juliet&#039;s smarter. She&#039;s not going around moping about some other guy immediately before declaring love for Romeo. Shooting/stabbing herself over the stupid boor isn&#039;t smart, of course, but we do have to accept that it&#039;s tragedy and that she&#039;s gotta die somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I would agree that Shakespeare&#8217;s teens aren&#8217;t really teens in the way we think of them today. But Luhrmann&#8217;s R &#038; J kind of are, even though they&#8217;re speaking Shakespeare&#8217;s lines. Not completely, but at least partially. I guess that&#8217;s what I find so jarring: updating them works, but I&#8217;m not quite sure how it works with the additional emphasis on tragic insight. </p>
<p>Definitely Juliet&#8217;s smarter. She&#8217;s not going around moping about some other guy immediately before declaring love for Romeo. Shooting/stabbing herself over the stupid boor isn&#8217;t smart, of course, but we do have to accept that it&#8217;s tragedy and that she&#8217;s gotta die somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j.</title>
		<link>http://www.theottery.com/2006/03/are-verona-beach-teens-capable-of-tragic-insight/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>j.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theottery.com/2006/03/are-verona-beach-teens-capable-of-tragic-insight/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>While you know how I feel about R&amp;J--whiny, lust-stricken teens sums it up nicely--we are coming at this from a 21st-century perspective. Juliet, as her mother tells her, is older at 13 than her mother was when Juliet was born. The concept of the teenager is a 20th-century one, just as the concept of the child belongs to the 19th. Perhaps in an age where 13 wasn&#039;t a child or a teen, but a marriagable woman, teenaged heroes, no matter how overrun by whacked-out hormones, are capable of tragic and/or heroic insight.

Besides, I have a great fondness for teenaged heroes, in YA fiction and elsewhere, so I am hesitant to say that none of them are capable of tragic insight. Of course, looking up at the post agagin, I just realized that you only asked if R&amp;J are capable of it, which is not a reflection on all teens anywhere.

FWIW, I&#039;ve always thought Juliet to be the more sympathetic and intelligent of the pair. Maybe I give her too much credit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While you know how I feel about R&amp;J&#8211;whiny, lust-stricken teens sums it up nicely&#8211;we are coming at this from a 21st-century perspective. Juliet, as her mother tells her, is older at 13 than her mother was when Juliet was born. The concept of the teenager is a 20th-century one, just as the concept of the child belongs to the 19th. Perhaps in an age where 13 wasn&#8217;t a child or a teen, but a marriagable woman, teenaged heroes, no matter how overrun by whacked-out hormones, are capable of tragic and/or heroic insight.</p>
<p>Besides, I have a great fondness for teenaged heroes, in YA fiction and elsewhere, so I am hesitant to say that none of them are capable of tragic insight. Of course, looking up at the post agagin, I just realized that you only asked if R&amp;J are capable of it, which is not a reflection on all teens anywhere.</p>
<p>FWIW, I&#8217;ve always thought Juliet to be the more sympathetic and intelligent of the pair. Maybe I give her too much credit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

